Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-05-02 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-05-02 House Journal Page 3327 HB 225 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 225 "An Act relating to municipal taxation of alcoholic beverages and increasing the alcoholic beverage tax rates." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) NT 3DP 1DNP 2AM 1063 FN1: (REV) 1064 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 4DP 3DNP 1NR 1AM 3275 FN2: (REV) 3276 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 225(FIN) "An Act relating to state taxation of alcoholic beverages; and increasing the alcoholic beverage state tax rates." There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2002-05-02 House Journal Page 3328 Amendment No. 1 was not offered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Meyer: Page 2, lines 7 - 19: Delete all material. Representative Meyer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cissna, Coghill, Green, Hayes, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Meyer, Murkowski, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh, Lancaster, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Wilson Excused: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Murkowski: Page 2, line 20, through page 3, line 15: Delete all material. Representative Murkowski moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Harris objected. 2002-05-02 House Journal Page 3329 Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The Speaker stated that the call would be in effect for the remainder of the calendar. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 25 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Fate, Green, Guess, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Lancaster, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Porter, Scalzi, Whitaker, Wilson Nays: Dyson, Foster, Harris, Hayes, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Rokeberg, Stevens, Williams Excused: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. Amendment No. 4 was not offered. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 2, line 13: Delete "brewer's Notice of Brewer" Insert "Brewer's Notice of Intent" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 5 was adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 225(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2002-05-02 House Journal Page 3330 CSHB 225(FIN) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 225(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 225(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 31 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Green, Guess, Halcro, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Lancaster, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Wilson Nays: Foster, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Meyer, Williams Excused: Ogan And so, CSHB 225(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Kott later gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 225(FIN) am, and the reconsideration was taken up then.